TAX 650 Short Paper Guidelines and Ruic Review the following case: Jim Turin & Sons, Inc.,...

Question

TAX 650 Short Paper Guidelines and Ruic   Review the following case: Jim Turin & Sons, Inc., Petitioner-Appellee, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent-Appellant. Analyze the cash method and the accrual method described in the case above. How did Jim Turin & Sons, Inc. assert its position? What were the key points in the decision that determined evenue recognition?  Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:   Analyzes the cash method described in the case   Analyzes the accrual methods described in the case   Assesses how Jim Turin & Sons inc. asserted its position in the case   Summarizes the key points in the decision that determined revenue recognition  Guidelines for Submission: Your paper must be submitted as a 2–4-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and at least three sources cited in APA format. Your paper must include at least three key points that determine the revenue recognition.   Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value Cash Method Analysis Meets “Proficient” criteria and analysis is supported with specific and relevant details Accurately analyzes the cash method described in the case Analyzes the cash method described in the case, but the esponse lacks depth and clarity Does not analyze the cash method described in the case 20 Accrual Method Analysis Meets “Proficient” criteria and analysis is supported with specific and relevant details Accurately analyzes the accrual method described in the case Analyzes the accrual method described in the case, but the esponse lacks depth and clarity Does not analyze the accrual method described in the case 20 Assessment of Jim Turin & Sons, Inc.’s Position Meets “Proficient” criteria and supports assessment with examples and details Effectively assesses how Jim Turin & Sons, Inc. asserted its position in the case Assesses how Jim Turin & Sons, Inc. asserted its position in the case, but the response lacks depth and clarity Does not assess how Jim Turin & Sons, Inc. asserted its position in the case 20 Summary Meets “Proficient” criteria and includes relevant details  Accurately summarizes at least three key points of the decision Summarizes at least three key points of the decision, but the esponse lacks depth and clarity Does not summarize three key points in the decision 20 http:law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/219/1103/532061 Articulation of Response Submission is free of eors elated to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to-ead format Submission has no major eors elated to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization Submission has major eors elated to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact eadability and articulation of main ideas Submission has critical eors elated to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas 20 Earned Total 100%

Monali · Accepted Answer

This case is regarding an appeal preferred by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (“Commissioner”) against an order by United States (US) Tax count. The commissioner was assessing one Jim Turin & Sons, Inc (tax payers) for computing federal taxes. Tax court delivered decision against the Commissioner on ground of definition of merchandise not applicable, no inventories and cashflow accounting method not used leading to abuse of discretion by commissioner in allowing accrual method.  Aggrieved by decision of Tax Court, the commissioner preferred appeal not barred by time. Definition and citations used as applicable and deemed suitable by parties. Both, Appeal Court and Tax Court ruling court, have jurisdiction. Appeal heard before Circuit Judges of appellant court.  
1. Analysis of cashflow method described in case:  Under cashflow method for federal tax computation, deduction for cost done immediately on payment by purchaser and income recognised when received. Logic behind cashflow method is that inventories made for resale, upon which deferral could be till purchase at yearend therefore taking its deduction at that time and finally selling goods in coming years without recognising income until such a point of receipt of payment. Goal of matching accounting books could fail due to not recognising credit sale in different years.       
2. Analysis of accrual method described in case: This method should be used when production,

TAX 650 Short Paper Guidelines and Rubric Review the following case: Jim Turin & Sons, Inc., Petitioner-Appellee, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent-Appellant. Analyze the cash method and...

Solution

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

Submit New Assignment