2006EHR Assignment – Workplace Audit / Inspection
BASIC INFO = APP. 3000 WORDS + TABLES
Introduction (introduction & Presentation worth 5 Marks)
Recommend 2 paragraphs
Paragraph 1 – Provide overview of workplace; what it is, where it is, who owns it, nature of work; nature of workforce (no need for references here)
Paragraph 2 – introduces;
(a) An overview of industry statistics, including rate of injury, mechanism of most common and or serious injuries in this industry and how compares with wider workforce
(b) A
ief summary of the H&S duties and steps stipulated in law that workplaces should follow to minimise such risks and be legally compliant with duties under WHS Act and supporting legislation (ie WHS Regulation 2011 & Codes of Practice)
(c) Brief statement of exactly what this Inspection focused on. This should identify BOTH the workplace inspected and particular hazard you focused on (here you may wish to note that in looking at a particular hazard you only focused on one part of the workplace)
(d) Conclusion:
iefly states whether or not workplace is compliant with WH&S law
Industry research (Industry research worth 7 Marks)
Recommend 2-3 paragraphs
Paragraphs 1-2 should summarise National and Qld H&S statistics that relate to your industry
Final paragraph – here you comment on the statistics and, where necessary, their limitations.
Social Factors (social factors worth 6 Marks)
Recommend 2 paragraphs
Paragraph 1 – Provide overview of the more formal factors that shape work at the workplace (Note: this paragraph should both restate and expand what you said in paragraph 1 of your introduction). It should include
(a) The workplace, who owns it, what it does, where it is
(b) How competitive is the industry (ie does it face a lot of competition)
(c) Does it have formal HRM and H&S Dpts and staff?
(d) Unionised?
Paragraph 2 – Provide overview of more informal factors at work such as
(a) Who are the workers? (casual, full-time, part-time, students, back-backers, age)
(b) What are the customers like
(c) What is the pace of work like
(d) What are the main job tasks, and the support – physically & organisationally – to ca
y them out
Inspection Results – Summary of Duties and Overall Compliance & Consultative A
angements (Duties, compliance and consultation worth 14 Marks)
* NOTE: This section is associated with Tables 1, 2 & 3
First paragraph/s should provide a summary of your observations regarding whether the WORKPLACE AS A WHOLE is meeting its duties under the WH&S Act 2011 & WHS Regulation. Provide Appendix Tables (See Example attached on next 3 pages) as supporting documentation for legal criteria in terms of the following:
· Begin here by stating clearly who has the primary duty of care at the workplace. Follow this by setting out the LEGAL criteria against which you used to assess the workplace’s performance & degree of compliance (see Table 1 for details).
· Also outline who else has duties and evidence as to legal compliance or otherwise (see Table 1 for details). Here, provide a BRIEF SUMMARY OF HAZARDS, CONTROLS AND RISKS YOU FOUND AS EVIDENCE OF LEGAL COMPLIANCE. Make this
ief as you will return to this in detail in the next sections
· Also outline the state of the OHS SYSTEM that exists to identify hazards, assess risks and implement controls (see Table 2 for details)
· Also outline the extent to which the Workplace has consultative a
angements in place to help it meet its duties (see Table 3 for details).
Inspection Results – Hazards, Risk and Controls (Hazards, Risk and Controls worth 13 Marks)
* NOTE: This section is associated with Tables 4, 5, 6 & 7
The main purpose of this section is to indicate
(a) the major hazards that you found at the workplace and the associated hazard (this goes with Table 4) – for example, the noise from the noisy machine is a hazard and the associated work activity is operating the noisy machine. With each hazard, indicate the legislative requirement that goes with it. For example, legal exposure to Noise is regulated by the Workplace Health & Safety Regulation, 2011: s. 56 + Prevention of Noise Code of Practice
(b) the major risks that you found (this goes with Table 5) – this follows on from above. For example, the risk from operating a noisy machine is industrial deafness
(c) calculation of risk (this goes with Table 6) – here you indicate the likelihood of the risk resulting in injury and disease, the consequences and the a risk rating. For this part, you will need to also provide risk calculations
(d) the controls that exist (this goes with Table 7)
SUPPORTING TABLES
Table 1: Duties
Person with duties
Legislative sections
Evidence of compliance / Non-compliance
Employer (PCBU)
WHS Act. S. 19
Poor /Medium / Good Compliance:
Many manual task hazards
Electrical hazards
Table 2: System of Risk Management
WHS Regulation
Criteria Set
Finding
WHS Reg. 35
Identify all hazards in consultation with workplace managers (officers) and workers
Table 3: Consultation
Consultative role / body
Legislative sections
Evidence meeting consultative Provisions
Health and Safety Rep (HSR) – ca
ying out functions
WHS Act s.68
HSR regularly undertakes Inspections
Table 4: Hazard Identification Registe
Identify the task or activity
What is a hazard associated with the task or activity
Legislative section relevant to Hazard
Hazard Ref. No.
H1
H2
H3
H4
H5
H6
Table 5: Risk Identification Registe
Hazard
Ref. No.
Risk Factors
Outcome of Exposure
Who may be affected
Who has Primary duty of Care
Risk Ref. No.
H1
R1
H2
R2
H3
R3
H4
R4
H5
R5
H6
R6
Table 6: Risk Assessment (see appended risk calculators for details)
Risk
Ref. No.
Estimated Likelihood
Estimated Consequences
Risk rating
R1
Medium Likelihood
Minor soft-tissue injury
Low
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
Likely
Major Injury
Very High
Note: With Table 6 you MUST do this in association with Risk Calculations that MUST be appended with the assignment
Table 7: Controlling Risk - Legislative requirements
For each of the identified risks ascertain the legislative requirement for control
For example; Risk - Noise exposure;
Risk
Ref. No.
Legislative Requirements
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
2006EHR Audit Marking criteria (2-pages)
Writing style (Max 5 marks)
The Paper is POORLY and contains a significant number of spelling and grammatical e
ors (0/5)
The Paper is ADEQUTELY written (there are a number of places where it is not clear, concise and well-organised) and contains a number of presentation and language e
ors (2.5 /3)
The Paper is SATISFACTORILY WRITTEN (there are a few places where it is not clear, concise and well-organised but has some spelling and grammatical e
ors (3.5/3)
The Paper is WELL WRITTEN (with sub-headings as required), and is clear, concise and readable. It has some spelling and grammatical e
ors and a competent introduction/conclusion.(5 /5)
Industry Research (Max 7 marks)
The Paper shows little evidence of research into industry employment patterns, injury rates and mechanisms of injury (0/7)
The Paper makes at least a minimal effort in terms of research into industry employment patterns, injury rates and mechanisms of injury (2/7)
The Paper makes a competent effort in terms of research into industry employment patterns, injury rates and mechanisms of injury (4/7)
The Paper makes a COMPREHENSIVE effort in terms of research into industry employment patterns, injury rates and mechanisms of injury (7 / 7)
Social Factors (Max 6 marks)
No identification or discussion of inte
elationship social factors with observed pattern of H&S – 0/6
Only basic observations on social factors that may impact on H&S – 2/6
Competent identification of some social factors that may impact on H&S – 4/6
Extensive identification of possible impact of number social factors on H&S – 6/6
Inspection Results – Duties, Compliance & Consultation (Max 14 marks)
No or very little identification of legal OHS duties and / or measures of compliance and / or discussion of consultative a
angements (either present or absent). Information in both body & tables lacking or largely in e
or – 0/ 14
A minimal identification of legal OHS duties and / or measures of compliance and / or discussion of consultative a
angements (either present or absent). Information in both body & tables of poor standard with major e
ors or omissions – 3 / 14
A modest identification of legal OHS duties and / or measures of compliance and / or discussion of consultative a
angements (either present or absent). Information in tables of poor standard with significant e
ors or omissions – 5/14
An uneven identification of legal OHS duties and / or measures of compliance and / or discussion of consultative a
angements (either present or absent). Information in tables of mixed standard with significant e
ors or omissions – 7 / 14
A passable identification of legal OHS duties and / or measures of compliance and / or discussion of consultative a
angements (either present or absent). Information in tables of mixed standard with e
ors or omissions – 7 / 12
A competent identification of legal OHS duties and / or measures of compliance and / or discussion of consultative a
angements (either present or absent). Information in tables of good standard although some notable e
ors or omissions – 9 / 14
A good identification of legal OHS duties and / or measures of compliance and / or discussion of consultative a
angements (either present or absent). Information in tables of good standard with few e
ors / omissions – 11/ 14
An excellent identification of legal OHS duties and / or measures of compliance and / or discussion of consultative a
angements (either present or absent). Information in tables of excellent standard with only minor e
ors or omissions – 12 / 14
An outstanding identification of OHS duties and / or measures of compliance and / or discussion of consultative a
angements. Information in tables of excellent standard. No e
ors / omissions – 14 /14
Inspection Results – Hazards and Risks (Max 13 marks)
No or very little identification of hazards or risks and / major e
ors in legislative compliance measures. Information in both body & tables lacking or largely in e
or – 0/ 13
A minimal identification of hazards or risks and / major e
ors in legislative compliance measures. Information in both body & tables of poor standard with major e
ors or omissions – 3/ 13
A modest identification of hazards or risks and / major e
ors in legislative compliance measures. Information in both body & tables of poor standard with significant e
ors or omissions – 6/ 13
An uneven identification of hazards or risks and / major e
ors in legislative compliance measures. Information in both body & tables of mixed standard with significant e
ors or omissions – 6 / 12
A passable identification of hazards or risks and / major e
ors in