2 XXXXXXXXXX2020
© The Independent Institute of Education (Pty) Ltd 2020
Page 1 of 9
MODULE NAME: MODULE CODE:
ACCOUNTING1B ACBP5112w
ACCOUNTING1B ACBP5122w
ASSESSMENT TYPE: ASSIGNMENT 1 (PAPER ONLY)
TOTAL MARK ALLOCATION: 100 MARKS
TOTAL HOURS: 15 HOURS
By submitting this assignment, you acknowledge that you have read and understood all the rules
as per the terms in the registration contract, in particular the assignment and assessment rules in
The IIE Assessment Strategy and Policy (IIE009), the intellectual integrity and plagiarism rules in
the Intellectual Integrity Policy (IIE023), as well as any rules and regulations published in the
student portal.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. No material may be copied from original sources, even if referenced co
ectly, unless it is a
direct quote indicated with quotation marks. No more than 10% of the assignment may
consist of direct quotes.
2. Any assignment with a similarity index of more than 25% will be scrutinised for
plagiarism. Please ensure you attach an originality report to your assignment if required.
3. Make a copy of your assignment before handing it in.
4. Assignments must be typed unless otherwise specified.
5. All work must be adequately and co
ectly referenced.
6. Begin each section on a new page.
7. Follow all instructions on the assignment cover sheet.
8. This is an individual assignment.
2 XXXXXXXXXX2020
© The Independent Institute of Education (Pty) Ltd 2020
Page 2 of 9
Referencing Ru
ic XXXXXXXXXX____
Providing evidence based on valid and referenced academic sources is a fundamental educational principle and the
cornerstone of high-quality academic work. Hence, The IIE considers it essential to develop the referencing skills of our
students in our commitment to achieve high academic standards. Part of achieving these high standards is referencing in a
way that is consistent, technically co
ect and congruent. This is not plagiarism, which is handled differently.
Poor quality formatting in your referencing will result in a penalty of a maximum of ten percent being deducted from the
mark awarded, according to the following guidelines. Please note, however, that evidence of plagiarism in the form of
copied or uncited work (not referenced), absent reference lists, or exceptionally poor referencing, may result in action
eing taken in accordance with The IIE’s Intellectual Integrity Policy (0023).
Markers are required to provide feedback to students by indicating (circling/underlining) the information that best
describes the student’s work.
Minor technical referencing e
ors: 5% deduction from the overall mark – the student’s work contains five or more
e
ors listed in the minor e
ors column in the table below.
Major technical referencing e
ors: 10% deduction from the overall mark – the student’s work contains five or more
e
ors listed in the major e
ors column in the table below.
If both minor and major e
ors are indicated, then 10% is deducted from the overall mark.
The examples provided below are not exhaustive but are provided to illustrate the e
or.
Required:
Technically co
ect referencing style
Minor e
ors
in technical co
ectness of referencing
style
Deduct 5% from mark awarded
Major e
ors
In technical co
ectness of referencing
style
Deduct 10% from mark awarded
Consistency
The same referencing format has been
used for all in-text references and in the
ibliography
eference list.
Minor inconsistencies.
The referencing style is generally
consistent, but there are one or two
changes in the format of in-text
eferencing and/or in the bibliography.
For example, page numbers for direct
quotes (in-text) have been provided for
one source, but not in another instance.
Two book chapters (bibliography) have
een referenced in the bibliography in two
different formats.
Major inconsistencies.
Poor and inconsistent referencing style
used in-text and/or in the bibliography/
eference list.
Multiple formats for the same type of
eferencing have been used.
For example, the format for direct quotes
(in-text) and/or book chapters
(bibliography/ reference list) is different
across multiple instances.
Technical co
ectness
Referencing format is technically co
ect
throughout the submission.
Position of the reference: a reference is
directly associated with every concept or
idea.
For example, quotation marks, page
numbers, years, etc. are applied co
ectly,
sources in the bibliography
eference list
are co
ectly presented.
Generally, technically co
ect with some
minor e
ors.
The co
ect referencing format has been
consistently used, but there are one or
two e
ors.
Concepts and ideas are typically
eferenced, but a reference is missing
from one small section of the work.
Position of the references: references are
only given at the beginning or end of every
paragraph.
For example, the student has inco
ectly
presented direct quotes (in-text) and/or
ook chapters (bibliography
eference
list).
Technically inco
ect.
The referencing format is inco
ect.
Concepts and ideas are typically
eferenced, but a reference is missing from
small sections of the work.
Position of the references: references are
only given at the beginning or end of large
sections of work.
For example, inco
ect author information
is provided, no year of publication is
provided, quotation marks and/or page
numbers for direct quotes missing, page
numbers are provided for paraphrased
material, the inco
ect punctuation is used
(in-text); the bibliography
eference list is
not in alphabetical order, the inco
ect
format for a book chapte
journal article is
used, information is missing e.g. no place
of publication had been provided
(bibliography); repeated sources on the
eference list.
Congruence between in-text referencing
and bibliography
eference list
All sources are accurately reflected and
are all accurately included in the
ibliography
eference list.
Generally, congruence between the in-text
eferencing and the bibliography/
eference list with one or two e
ors.
There is largely a match between the
sources presented in-text and the
ibliography.
For example, a source appears in the text,
ut not in the bibliography
eference list
or vice versa.
A lack of congruence between the in-text
eferencing and the bibliography.
No relationship/several incongruences
etween the in-text referencing and the
ibliography
eference list.
For example, sources are included in-text,
ut not in the bibliography and vice versa,
a link, rather than the actual reference is
provided in the bibliography.
In summary: the recording of references
is accurate and complete.
In summary, at least 80% of the sources
are co
ectly reflected and included in a
eference list.
In summary, at least 60% of the sources
are inco
ectly reflected and/or not
included in reference list.
Overall Feedback about the consistency, technical co
ectness and congruence between in-text referencing and bibliography:
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
2 XXXXXXXXXX2020
© The Independent Institute of Education (Pty) Ltd 2020
Page 3 of 9
Question 1 XXXXXXXXXXMarks: 20)
The following information was taken from the books of Orlando Pirates Traders for April and
May 2020.
Table of items appearing on the bank reconciliation statement of Orlando Pirates Traders for
April 2020.
Details Amount (R)
Balance as per bank statement XXXXXXXXXX
Less outstanding cheques:
Outstanding cheque: Cheque XXXXXXXXXX )
Outstanding cheque: Cheque XXXXXXXXXX)
Add outstanding deposits:
Outstanding deposit: Deposit Slip no XXXXXXXXXX
Balance as per bank account XXXXXXXXXX
Bank statement from Sundowns Bank for Orlando Pirates Traders — May 2020
DATE DESCRIPTION DEBIT (R) CREDIT (R) BALANCE (R)
1 Opening Balance XXXXXXXXXX
1 Deposit XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX
4 Cheque XXXXXXXXXX 595.86
6 Cheque XXXXXXXXXX464.66
8 Cheque XXXXXXXXXX473.61
13 Deposit XXXXXXXXXX.23
20 Cheque XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX
21 Cheque XXXXXXXXXX 579.91
22 Deposit XXXXXXXXXX40
24 Deposit XXXXXXXXXX.96
25 Monthly service fees
350.00
XXXXXXXXXX
26 Direct deposit — L. Radebe XXXXXXXXXX538.96
27 Cheque XXXXXXXXXX538.96
30 Debit order — Cell C XXXXXXXXXX884.76
2 XXXXXXXXXX2020
© The Independent Institute of Education (Pty) Ltd 2020
Page 4 of 9
Cashbook Payments of Orlando Pirates Traders — May 2020
DATE
CHEQUE
COUNTERFOIL
NUMBER
AMOUNT (R)
4 CC XXXXXXXXXX
17 CC XXXXXXXXXX
20 CC XXXXXXXXXX
26 CC XXXXXXXXXX
30 CC XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX
Cashbook Receipts of Orlando Pirates Traders — May 2020
DATE
DEPOSIT SLIP
NUMBER
AMOUNT
13 DS XXXXXXXXXX
22 DS XXXXXXXXXX
24 DS XXXXXXXXXX