Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

1. This assignment is to be submitted in accordance with assessment policy stated in the Subject Outline and Student Handbook. 2. It is the responsibility of the student who is submitting the work, to...

1 answer below »

1. This assignment is to be submitted in accordance with assessment policy stated in the Subject Outline and Student Handbook.
2. It is the responsibility of the student who is submitting the work, to ensure that the work is in fact her/his own work. Incorporating another’s work or ideas into one’s own work without appropriate acknowledgement is an academic offence. Students can submit all assignments for plagiarism checking (self-check) on Blackboard before final submission in the subject. For further details, please refer to the Subject Outline and Student Handbook.
3. Maximum marks available: 20 marks.
4. Due date of submission: Friday Week 8
5. Assignment should be of 2,000 words. Please use “wordcount” and include in report.
Guidelines for Literature Critiques
Students must submit a critique of an academic article deemed to be seminal to their main area of research. Details about the format, structure and assessment criteria for the critique are presented below. Remember that the critique is due in weeks 8.
FORMAT: 2000 words (maximum)
The critique submission should be typed. Work should be double-spaced with a 2.4cm margin on all sides. Use only one side of each sheet of paper.
STRUCTURE:
While there is room for being innovative, most critiques should include the following:
  • Cover Page
  • Synopsis
  • Introduction: Introducing the topic, stating the aims of the critique, outlining the main argument to be presented and an overview of the paper and the structure of the paper to follow.
  • Summary of the Article: Focusing on its main argument, including its aims, its overall findings and its theoretical arguments and contribution.
  • Research Question: Identifying the article’s research question(s) or hypotheses and discussing its value, explaining whether and how it flowed from the literature review.
  • Theoretical Framework: Identifying and discussing the theoretical framework or theoretical substance of the paper leading to the research element.
  • The Significance and Limitations of the Article: Use the literature to discuss the limitations of the theory and methodology used. Does the author acknowledge these limitations? Does the author draw theoretical conclusions from the research that are justified by the methodology? How do these limitations affect the significance of the article and the contribution it makes to the discipline, particularly the findings set against the research method?
  • Conclusions: Summarising the main points and drawing implications of your critique.
Answered Same Day Dec 24, 2021

Solution

Robert answered on Dec 24 2021
124 Votes
Synopsis:
The paper discusses the outlining of positive theory of accounting by understanding the
factors that influence the attitude of the senior level management in the process of setting and
adopting accounting standards for the organization. The firm is an outcome of the
management’s decisions which is why it becomes important to study this. There are various
factors including taxes, regulation, management compensation plans, bookkeeping costs, and
political costs, which affect an organization’s cash flows, which in turn are affected by the
choice of accounting standards. This paper designs a model by combining these factors which
is able to predict that large firms favor the change, when they see a reduction in their earnings
ecause of change in accounting standards. In general, all other firms will oppose the change
if they incur additional bookkeeping costs, which can justify the cost of accounting standards
lo
ying. This hypothesis was tested with the use of corporate submissions to the FASB's
Discussion Memorandum on General Price Level Adjustments. The authors found that the
empirical results were consistent with their theory.
Introduction:
We will describe the concept of the generally accepted theory of positive accounting i.e.
PAT. In this paper we will critically analyze the theory and see what influences management
ehavior in the process of accounting standards setting. Also we will compare it with normative
accounting theory. We will attempt to understand the relevance of accounting theories used in
the corporate world and will align them with the requirements of the organization. The theory
gives a direction for financial reporting function in an organization and therefore has
contributed significantly to the financial reporting standards. Here we will try to understand
the management’s role in the process of accounting standard setting and on the basis of it
develop a theory to rationalize the design of accounting standards. Before the emergence of
positive accounting theory, the accounting field was dominated by the normative accounting
theory. They are both important in their own ways and have their own significance in the
industry.
Summary of the article:
This paper builds up in the initial work done around the study of management incentives
elated to accounting standards. This study focuses on the cost-benefit analysis of accounting
standards from the management’s perspective. Management is motivated by various
incentives, which drives their choice of these standards. Also, we cannot underestimate the
management’s role in the determination of the accounting standards. Their view is critical to
any discussion related to financial reporting in an organization. Therefore, the pre-requisite
to understanding the positive theory of standard-setting is to analyze the incentives that sway
management's actions.
For simplification, the initial assumption is that the interests of the management align with
that of the shareholders. Second assumption is that management's utility (or the satisfaction in
layman terms) is a positive function of the expected compensation in future periods (or
wealth), which means that satisfaction increases with increase in compensation. It adds that
utility is a negative function of the dispersion of future compensation (or wealth), or decrease
of wealth. This assumptions helps bifurcate the mechanisms which increases management’s
compensation by increase in share price and by increase in incentive cash bonuses.
We
iefly discuss the factors (e.g., tax, regulatory, political considerations) which are
elieved to be the motivator of management actions. They decide how management utilizes
the resource sit has to achieve its desired outcomes and therefore affects the process of setting
standards.
 Taxes: Tax laws do not affect the financial accounting standards directly except in
some cases but they have a very well established indirect relationship. The
management will try to get the most conducive tax rate to get...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here