UNCC100: Self and Community:
Exploring the Anatomy of Modern Society
Assessment Task 1: Quiz – Semester 2,
2022
Prescribed template for Canberra, Melbourne, North
Sydney, Online students
In this quiz you
will show your understanding of the principles of Catholic social thought, with
reference to the prescribed resources. You will do this in the format of short
responses to six quiz questions, using the prescribed template (which is this
document).
All students
will have 60 hours to submit their responses via Turnitin.
Therefore, the
due date for this assessment task is: Sunday, 14 August 2022, 11:00pm AEST.
It is a
requirement that you:
a) cite at least
the following three readings/resources:
i. Lisa Sowle
Cahill, “Catholic Social Teaching,” in The Cambridge Companion to Christian
Political Theology, ed. Craig Hovey and Elizabeth Phillips (Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, XXXXXXXXXX–87.
ii. two
resources (e.g., LEO book, a linked article, reading (other than Cahill, 2015),
a YouTube video, etc.) that are included in the LEO folder/tile for Module 1:
Catholic social thought principles (NB: two resources from LEO in total).
Further
instructions:
a) This is an
open-book quiz.
b) This is not a
group exercise. You will complete your responses on your own.
c) The quiz will
not be timed (i.e., you can complete the quiz in more than one sitting), but
you will only have 60 hours to submit your responses to this task.
d) Students are
required to use the prescribed template (which is this document)
and upload their completed submission through Turnitin (i.e., we are not using
the quiz technology in LEO for this assessment task).
Please note that
once you have completed answering the six quiz questions, you will be required to
save and submit this document through the ‘Assessment Task 1: Quiz’ Turnitin
drop box for marking. You can find the Turnitin drop box in the ‘Assessment’
folder/tile on LEO.
__________________________________________________________________________________
Question 1: Your response to this question is to be 100 words –
which equates to approximately six lines in this template.
According to Cahill, identify one
similarity and one difference between Catholic social teaching and
Catholic social thought.
_________________
Question 2: Your response to this question is to be 100 words –
which equates to approximately six lines in this template.
According to Cahill, what social
issues did Rerum Novarum seek to address in its historical context?
_________________
Question 3: Your response to this question is to be 100 words –
which equates to approximately six lines in this template.
Rerum Novarum was published by Pope Leo XIII in 1891, more than 130 years ago.
Identify one insight that we can garner from this text, based on your
reading of Cahill, and relate it to a present context in Australia.
_________________
Question 4: Your response
to this question is to be 150 words – which equates to
approximately ten lines in this template.
Using at least one LEO
resource* from Module 1, suggest how one Catholic social thought
principle (excluding human dignity and the common good) might relate to
the experience of migrants to Australia from countries affected by
civil/international conflict or natural disasters. [*LEO
resource = LEO book, a linked article, reading, a YouTube video, etc.].
_________________
Question 5: Your response
to this question is to be 150 words – which equates to
approximately ten lines in this template.
Using at least one LEO
resource from Module 1, suggest how one other Catholic social thought
principle (excluding human dignity, the common good and the CST principle
you used in answering question 4) might relate to the experience of
migrants to Australia from countries affected by civil/international conflict
or natural disasters. [NB: this question is
different to question 4 – please read it carefully.].
_________________
Question 6: Your response to this question is to be 150 words –
which equates to approximately ten lines in this template.
If, in Cahill’s words, Catholic social
teaching must continue “to grasp that the option for the poor has to become an
option of and by the poor, framed from the poor’s perspective”
(p. 83), how is this relevant to migrants to Australia from countries affected
by civil/international conflict or natural disasters? [NB: When we refer to “the poor’s perspective,” we’re referring to
marginalisation broadly, which includes economic aspects, as well as health,
employment, government assistance, etc.].
_________
Bibliography/Reference List