Marking Criteria | High Distinction | Distinction | Credit | Pass | Fail |
Meeting the brief | Author has met the assignment instructions in a comprehensive manner, demonstrating creativity and critical reflection | Author has demonstrated critical thinking and makes a strong argument throughout | Author has responded to essay question, but has done so in a descriptive, rather than critical manner | Author has met some, but not all of the assignment instructions and does not adequately respond to the question being answered | Author has responded to the assignment question in a way that does not demonstrate an understanding of the relevant material or concepts |
Structure | The paper is highly articulate, the paragraphs are linked and have an observable flow An argument is clearly developed, coherent, and well-structured; conclusions are compellingly supported. | The paper is well-written and free from errors An argument is clearly developed; conclusions are very well supported. | The paper is well-structured, although it is often descriptive. An argument is clearly developed; conclusions are well supported. | There is little flow in this writing and inconsistencies in the structure An argument is evident but is poorly developed; conclusions are supported in a minimal way. | There is little structure present in this paper There is no evidence of an argument; conclusions are not supported. |
Writing Style: Spelling, grammar and punctuation | Rules of spelling, grammar and punctuation are consistently adhered to – there are no errors | Rules of spelling, grammar and punctuation are consistently adhered to but there are occasional errors. | Rules of spelling, grammar and punctuation are adhered to but there are some errors. | Rules of spelling, grammar and punctuation are mostly adhered to. | Rules of spelling, grammar and/or punctuation are not adhered to. |
Referencing and use of resources | Referencing is extensive and complies consistently to an accepted system in every way Author has used multiple, appropriate sources which support the argument made in the paper | Referencing complies consistently to an accepted system. There are no errors. Author has used appropriate sources | Referencing complies consistently with an accepted system with minimal errors. Author has used the required number of appropriate references | Referencing complies with an accepted system, but there are some errors. Although the paper has been referenced, the references chosen do not always support the argument being made in the paper (if there is one) | Referencing does not meet academic standards No references used and/or references used are inappropriate and do not support the argument being made |
Academic Integrity Read about academic integrity here, http://www.flinders.edu.au/teaching/quality/aims/info-for-staff/information-for-staff_home.cfm | | | | Poor attention paid to properly acknowledging sources used to support the argument | Clear evidence that material has been directly copied and pasted from another source, with or without acknowledgement |