Microsoft Word - NSG3NCI Assessment 2 criteria and guidelines 2020
Assignment 2: Case Study
Instructions:
Assessment type: Case study
Length: 1500 words (+/- 10%)
Weighting: 35%
Instructions:
This case study is adapted from Bob’s s story, which you can watch here :
https:
youtu.be/ZE0zinlDmFs. You may also refer to the videos and full transcript on the PCC4U
weblink.
Bob is a 64-year-old gentleman. Bob was diagnosed with motor neurone disease (MND) just over
a year ago, and because of his work as an electrician, it was deemed too dangerous for Bob to
keep on working. Bob has no other medical past history and had been fit and well prior to
diagnosis. Bob and his wife Margaret initially didn’t know what motor neurone disease was, as
such Bob’s neurologist refe
ed Bob and Margaret on to the MND association. Bob found the
MND information pretty confronting at first. Bob found the MND
ochures to be very frank about
what happens.
Bob reflects on his diagnosis
“ MND is a cruel disease. I was really angry for a few weeks and you immediately think ‘why me’,
‘why now’. I didn’t take it very well, I really took it out on the family. Everyone’s different of course
ut you’ve just gotta do what’s best for you. I found others that were coming to terms with issues
like ‘what it’s like to not be the
ead winner anymore’ and you know that sooner or later you’re
going to have to relinquish some of your responsibilities, but you just can’t do everything. These
were some of the hardest adjustments I’ve had to make, but it’s hard when you think people just
aren’t listening to what you want. Everyone seems to be an expert on what you should be doing.”
Three months later Bob's illness progresses. Bob has severe weakness in his arms but is still
able to walk around. Bob has been refe
ed to a physiotherapist and occupational therapist to
determine what can be done to improve his physical and social functioning. When the
physiotherapist visits Bob, she finds Bob is increasingly experiencing speech difficulties and is
ecoming frustrated by his decrease in independence.
.
You are required to write a case -based essay that answers the following questions. You are not
equired to discuss Bob’s specific medical diagnosis, as in the specific pathophysiology of MND;
the focus of this essay is to explore the role of advance care planning in the context of Bob’s
chronic illness progression. This will require you to have an understanding of the illness
trajectory of MND.
Using The Medical Treatment Planning and Decisions Act which came into effect on March, 2018
http:
www.legislation.vic.gov.au/Domino/Web_Notes/LDMS/PubStatbook.nsf/f932b66241ecf1b7c
a256e92000e23be/B4D3EBB66E52E98CCA25807A0014F70D/$FILE/16-069aa%20authorised.pdf
Discuss the possible benefits of Advance care planning for Bob and Margaret
At what point throughout Bob’s illness trajectory might a conversation on advanced
care planning be initiated with Bob? There may be differing opinions on this within the
literature, please describe these.
What sort of information should be included in the advance care plan? Discuss any
supporting documents (relevant in Victoria) that may be included in the Advance care
plan.
When would the advance care plan be reviewed and activated?
When you plan your essay, consider a person-centred approach to support your discussion. You
need to support your discussion with high quality, peer reviewed literature. Your essay needs to
draw from legislation that is relevant to Victoria, as laws and legislation vary both nationally and
internationally.
In your essay:
Identify Bob, his diagnosis of MND and how it applies to the progression of his chronic
illness to set the context for your discussion. To do this you will need an understanding
of the illness trajectory of MND, and how the progression of the disease will impact Bob.
used
Include an introduction, body and conclusion in your essay. Use headings to indicate the
topic you are discussing. The four essay questions can be used as headings. Please
efer to the ‘achieve@uni’ help guides: https:
latrobe.libguides.com/assessments/essays
Ensure you have clear and logical transitions between the introduction, body, and
conclusion.
Discuss why advance care planning is important in relation to person centred care, and
informed decision making by drawing from your research sources and their arguments.
You are required to use peer reviewed, scholarly articles to support each point you make.
You may use Australian government or other authoritative websites as a point of
eference, however the use of web- based sources, or any non -peer reviewed sources is
not acceptable (ie Better Health channel, Wikipedia).
Discuss what sort of information would be included in an advance care plan, refe
ing to
the Victoria specific forms which can be found here:
https:
www.advancecareplanning.org.au
esources/advance-care-planning-for-your-state-
te
itory/vic
Discuss when an advance care plan would be reviewed (remembering that advance care
planning is an ongoing process and people’s preferences may change over time), and when
it would be activated.
Make sure that any statement of fact is supported by evidence, co
ectly referenced in-
text and in the reference list. When using evidence, paraphrase where possible, and
always cite sources.
Conclude your essay by summarising, not simply restating the essay but by readdressing
it considering the evidence provided. Never add any additional and new information in the
conclusion!
Assessment Criteria:
1) Have you reviewed the case study, Medical Treatment Planning and Decisions Act, 2016,
discussed any supporting documents that may be included in the process
2) Is your discussion clear, concise and defined?
3) Have you answered all the essay questions?
4) Resources (Research). Have you used appropriate literature to support your discussion?
5) Writing
Clear expression
Clear and logical structure
Logical transitions between sections
Clear paragraphs (topic sentence, evidence, analysis)
Academic language use e.g. appropriate vocabulary
Spelling and grammar
Punctuation
6) Referencing
APA 7 La Trobe style is consistently
In-text referencing is used
A reference list is included
References are co
ectly formatted and listed
Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs)
1. Design appropriate chronic disease management plans or interdisciplinary team care
a
angements based on the lived experiences of persons with chronic illness.
2. Evaluate chronic illness management methods to determine strategies that promote active
engagement of persons, families and carers with health services.
3. Generate evidence-based recommendations for how to improve the sustainability of chronic
illness management approaches in terms of their impact on natural, economic, social, political and
cultural systems.