Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

Critique Essay Outline How to Write an Outline Introduction Introduce the source, state overall evaluation of it Response Segment 1 Your first claim critiquing the source article Use evidence to...

1 answer below »

Critique Essay Outline
How to Write an Outline
    Introduction
    Introduce the source, state overall evaluation of it
    Response Segment 1 
    Your first claim critiquing the source article
Use evidence to support your claim
    Response Segment 2
    Your second claim critiquing the source article
Use evidence to support your claim
    Response Segment 3
    Your third claim critiquing the source article
Use evidence to support your claim
    Conclusion
    Sum up main points from the essay
An outline can be as formal and detailed or as loose as you wish. At its simplest, it would be a quick list of the main ideas or sections in your essay, in the order you expect them to go. FOR EXAMPLE:
Critique Essay Outline
1. Analyze Claims, Reasons, and Evidence:
Examine the source you are analyzing for your project. Generate a couple of
ief paragraphs in which you analyze the writer's claims and reason's evidence by applying these standards:
· Has the writer provided evidence in support of key claims?
· Has the writer properly interpreted the sources and pieces of evidence on which their thesis relies?
· Can you verify the accuracy of the writer's claims, reasons and evidence?
· Has the evidence been used properly?
· Are the sources from which the evidence is drawn reliable and relevant?
2. Raise Questions about Fairness:
Write a couple of
ief paragraphs that explore bias, use of language, and point of view in your source. Are there any loaded (biased) terms, unfair characterizations, misrepresentations? Are there any places where the writer leaves out an important alternative viewpoint or belittles an opposing perspective?
(Remember that it is possible that you will discover that the writer of your argument is fair-minded and unbiased: Your questions will not necessarily uncover bias and unfairness.)
3. Create the Outline:
Content and structure:
· In the introduction section, you need to include a provisional thesis statement that indicates your critique on the source article.
· In the body paragraphs, you need to write clear topic sentences that echo the three points in the thesis statement. Then, use evidence to support the main points. Evidence includes ideas from the source article, expert opinions, examples, and so on.
· In the conclusion section, you need to restate the thesis and add a memorable statement.
Sentence and organization:
· Write complete sentences in the outline. Make sure all ideas are coherent.
· The outline will be marked based on completeness, coherence, and grammar.
Some Helpful Hints:
For the Critique Essay, respond to your source from the following angles:
Analyze Fairness:
· What biases, if any, are present in the argument?
· Has the writer treated opposing viewpoints fairly? Is the language appropriate?
PLEASE NOTE:
1. YOU MUST WRITE COMPLETE SENTENCES IN THIS OUTLINE.
2. YOU CAN USE BULLET POINT FORM.
3. WHERE NECESSARY, USE TRANSITIONAL WORDS TO CONNECT IDEAS.
USE THE TEMPLATE PROVIDED BELOW TO ANSWER
POLITICS HAS BECOME A THANKLESS, DANGEROUS JOB: OPINION
When Catherine McKenna announced she was leaving politics, she experienced an instant sense of relief.
It wasn't the insane workload and hours - she was never afraid of hard work. Or the travel and the back-to-back meetings and the co
osive effect of snide partisanship. No, what she felt immediate respite from was fear - the fear that accompanies today's politicians, especially ones with high-profile roles overseeing controversial files.
"I think the biggest thing was as a cabinet minister I constantly felt on edge," the former environment minister told me in an interview. "It was the constant threats, people ve
ally accosting my staff and defacing my constituency office and sending me smashed up Ba
ie dolls.
"You realize people know where you live. You do think a lot about the safety of your children. It's like this ho
ible cloud that follows you everywhere, and you have to try and pretend it's not there but you can't. You have to take threats seriously."
Ms. McKenna is precisely the type of person we hope to attract to politics: Smart, articulate, passionate about important issues, a fierce advocate for women and girls. Her absence leaves a hole.
But who can blame her for wanting to leave given the constant harassment she faced? Why would anyone want to go into politics these days?
One never knows when deranged, malicious utterances on some social media platform might lead to something more serious. The recent killing of British MP David Amess, sta
ed to death while meeting constituents in a church hall, is a tragic reminder of the increasing threat politicians all around the world face.
While the risk of violence has been something legislators have always had to live with, there is a sense it's much worse now, amplified by social media and the ecosystem of the aggrieved.
"If you hate Catherine McKenna, Facebook will go find you other people who hate me too."
It seems we have a few choices.
One option is finally getting serious with the social media platforms that are creating a dangerous work environment for politicians. Facebook and Twitter, among others, have said they will deal with the issue but have demonstrated little will to do so.
This is no longer a freedom of speech issue. This is a public safety issue, and we shouldn't fear trampling on certain rights in the name of a safer world.
The second option is massively increasing the security budgets for our elected officials. In Canada this would cost billions.
Think about the home security systems that would be needed, the bodyguards. The fortress you would have to turn the House of Commons into. I doubt this would be very appealing to the public.
The third option is doing nothing and accepting that increasingly fewer of our best people are going to want to have anything to do with civic life because of the risk it poses to their personal safety and that of their families. I would argue this is already happening.
Every day it seems there is another report of a politician being screamed at or threatened in a public place. It happened to Conservative MP Michelle Rempel Garner when she and her husband were out for dinner during the election campaign. A man came up and started yelling at her. The same thing happened recently to Vancouver Mayor Kennedy Stewart. He and his wife were at a downtown liquor store when a man in his 50s approached the mayor and started screaming at him, daring him to step outside and fight. He then started in on the mayor's wife.
Police were called, and the matter remains under investigation.
I thought about this when I interviewed Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in downtown Vancouver in July. After the interview, he plunged into a waiting crowd to take selfies. How easy it would have been, I thought, for some lunatic to do serious harm to the PM. Scenes like that are likely soon coming to an end.
It needs to be said that not all politicians are blameless here.
Some are responsible for the kind of incendiary language that stokes division and hatred. The Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol is a prime example of that. Some of the statements by People's Party of Canada Leader Maxime Bernier during the recent election were highly inflammatory.
We need to take this issue far more seriously than we do now.
The future of our country literally depends on it.
Copyright The Globe and Mail Oct 20, 2021
Critique Essay Outline Template
Please note:
1. You must write complete sentences in this outline.
1. You can use bullet point form.
1. Where necessary, use transitional words to connect ideas.
    Introduction
    Introduce the source
Create a thesis statement that indicates your critique on the source article
    Response Segment 1
    Write a topic sentence that indicates your first claim critiquing the source article
Use evidence (examples, quotations, and analysis) to support the topic sentence and comment on the evidence
    Response Segment 2
    Write a topic sentence that indicates your second claim critiquing the source article
Use evidence (examples, quotations, and analysis) to support the topic sentence and comment on the evidence
    Response Segment 3
    Write a topic sentence that indicates your third claim critiquing the source article
Use evidence (examples, quotations, and analysis) to support the topic sentence and comment on the evidence
    Conclusion
    Restate the thesis statement
Restate the main points
Add a memorable statement
Answered Same Day Feb 02, 2022

Solution

Bhawna answered on Feb 02 2022
111 Votes
Critique Essay Outline
How to Write an Outline
    Introduction
    Introduce the source, state overall evaluation of it
    Response Segment 1 
    Your first claim critiquing the source article
Use evidence to support your claim
    Response Segment 2
    Your second claim critiquing the source article
Use evidence to support your claim
    Response Segment 3
    Your third claim critiquing the source article
Use evidence to support your claim
    Conclusion
    Sum up main points from the essay
An outline can be as formal and detailed or as loose as you wish. At its simplest, it would be a quick list of the main ideas or sections in your essay, in the order you expect them to go. FOR EXAMPLE:
Critique Essay Outline
1. Analyze Claims, Reasons, and Evidence:
Examine the source you are analyzing for your project. Generate a couple of
ief paragraphs in which you analyze the writer's claims and reason's evidence by applying these standards:
· Has the writer provided evidence in support of key claims?
· Has the writer properly interpreted the sources and pieces of evidence on which their thesis relies?
· Can you verify the accuracy of the writer's claims, reasons and evidence?
· Has the evidence been used properly?
· Are the sources from which the evidence is drawn reliable and relevant?
2. Raise Questions about Fairness:
Write a couple of
ief paragraphs that explore bias, use of language, and point of view in your source. Are there any loaded (biased) terms, unfair characterizations, misrepresentations? Are there any places where the writer leaves out an important alternative viewpoint or belittles an opposing perspective?
(Remember that it is possible that you will discover that the writer of your argument is fair-minded and unbiased: Your questions will not necessarily uncover bias and unfairness.)
3. Create the Outline:
Content and structure:
· In the introduction section, you need to include a provisional thesis statement that indicates your critique on the source article.
· In the body paragraphs, you need to write clear topic sentences that echo the three points in the thesis statement. Then, use evidence to support the main points. Evidence includes ideas from the source article, expert opinions, examples, and so on.
· In the conclusion section, you need to restate the thesis and add a memorable statement.
Sentence and organization:
· Write complete sentences in the outline. Make sure all ideas are coherent.
· The outline will be marked based on completeness, coherence, and grammar.
Some Helpful Hints:
For the Critique Essay, respond to your source from the following angles:
Analyze Fairness:
· What biases, if any, are present in the argument?
· Has the writer treated opposing viewpoints fairly? Is the language appropriate?
PLEASE NOTE:
1. YOU MUST WRITE COMPLETE SENTENCES IN THIS OUTLINE.
2. YOU CAN USE BULLET POINT FORM.
3. WHERE NECESSARY, USE TRANSITIONAL WORDS TO CONNECT IDEAS.
USE THE TEMPLATE PROVIDED BELOW TO ANSWER
POLITICS HAS BECOME A THANKLESS, DANGEROUS JOB: OPINION
When Catherine McKenna announced she was leaving politics, she experienced an instant sense of relief.
It wasn't the insane workload and hours - she was never afraid of hard work. Or the travel and the back-to-back meetings and the co
osive effect of snide partisanship. No, what she felt immediate respite from was fear - the fear that accompanies today's politicians, especially ones with high-profile roles overseeing controversial files.
"I think the biggest thing was as a cabinet minister I constantly felt on edge," the former environment minister told me in an interview. "It was the constant threats, people...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here